The Great Idle

The Great Idle

In the year 2127, an enigmatic epidemic known as the Great Idle swept across the world. It was an odd disease, causing only a mild cough lasting two to three days with no fever. The virus responsible for the epidemic was so unremarkable that it was discovered merely by chance. However, its long-term effects were anything but ordinary – it rendered those affected by it incredibly lazy.

Rumors swirled around the globe, feeding on uncertainty and fear. Some insisted that the virus was man-made, a product of a clandestine lab experiment gone wrong. Others were convinced it originated from animals, a zoonotic disease that jumped from beasts to humans in some murky corner of the world.

“Did you hear about the new virus?” a woman asked her friend as they walked down a bustling street in New York City, the city that never slept but now seemed to be napping. “I heard it was cooked up in a lab somewhere. It’s turning everyone into lazy bums!”

Her friend scoffed. “Nah, it’s just another one of those diseases that jumped from animals to humans. You know, like the old pandemics.”

Meanwhile, in a lively market in Beijing, a vendor and his customer debated the origins of the virus.

“I’m telling you, it’s man-made,” the vendor insisted, waving a hand dismissively. “It’s all part of a plot to control us.”

The customer shook his head, unconvinced. “No, I think it’s just nature taking its course. The virus probably came from some animal we’ve never even heard of.”

Newspapers and TV broadcasts around the world were saturated with headlines and breaking news stories about the epidemic. The New York Times front page headline read, “The Laziness Epidemic: Man-Made Disaster or Nature’s Cruel Joke?” while CNN’s top story was titled, “The Great Idle: A Crisis of Laziness Sweeping the World.”

Regardless of its origins, the world became consumed by the epidemic. Within two years, the entire human population was affected, leading to a significant decline in productivity and a catastrophic impact on global economies. Stock markets plummeted, businesses closed their doors, and once-thriving industries ground to a halt as the world struggled to adapt to this new reality.

In the early days of the epidemic, doctors struggled to understand the mysterious virus. They initially believed the symptoms were similar to the long-lasting fatigue experienced by some individuals during the Covid-19 pandemic, which had swept across the globe back in 2020, claiming millions of lives and leaving a lasting impact on society.

By the year 2127, people had already transitioned to a three-day workweek, a significant reduction from the standard five-day week during the Covid-19 pandemic era. This change had allowed for a more balanced lifestyle, with a greater focus on leisure and personal development.

As the world struggled to understand and adapt to the Great Idle, assembling the panel of experts became a monumental task in itself. The epidemic of laziness had infiltrated the scientific community, making it difficult to gather a group of motivated individuals willing to participate in the discussion. Coordinators sent invitations and reminders, but the responses were either delayed or non-committal.

“We need your expertise on the panel,” one coordinator pleaded over the phone with a prominent psychologist.

“I’d love to help, but I just can’t seem to find the energy to commit to it,” the psychologist replied, yawning. “Maybe next week… or the week after.”

It took several years, hundreds of phone calls, and an assortment of incentives to finally assemble a group of experts willing to put aside their newfound idleness to discuss the implications of the epidemic. When the panel finally convened, it was a testament to the extraordinary effort and dedication of those who recognized the gravity of the situation and were willing to overcome their own laziness to confront the challenges posed by the Great Idle.

An economist on the panel remarked, “With the current three-day workweek, we’ve managed to maintain a delicate balance between work and leisure. If this epidemic of laziness reduces the workweek even further, say to a mere two days, people will be spending their entire lives in leisure. We must find a solution before our economies collapse entirely.”

A psychologist countered, “But have you considered that perhaps this virus is nature’s way of recalibrating human thinking? It might be nudging us toward a different mode of existence, where we prioritize leisure, contemplation, and a slower pace of life.”

The panel continued to debate, their voices rising in intensity as they presented their theories. The economist insisted, “Nature’s intervention or not, we can’t afford to lose our drive and productivity. Our world depends on it.”

The psychologist maintained her position, “We must also recognize the potential benefits of this shift in human motivation. It could lead us toward a more balanced and fulfilling way of living.”

In the end, all experts agreed that the discussion was rather pointless and they were too lazy to continue discussing the long-term consequences. They agreed they should allow nature to run its course. And with that, the world continued to grapple with the profound implications of the Great Idle. The panel’s conversation epitomized the larger debate within society, as scholars and citizens alike sought to understand and adapt to the epidemic’s transformative effects on human motivation and global economies. Deep in their hearts, everyone was secretly content with this unexpected outcome of the pandemic.

In the next decade, the working week was indeed reduced to a mere two days, as the epidemic of laziness continued to spread. As this monumental change took root, an unexpected phenomenon emerged. With everyone enveloped in the grip of laziness, no one could be bothered to start new wars or engage in conflicts. The world entered an unprecedented era of peace, and humanity began to view the Great Idle in a different light.

Two friends, Samantha and David, were walking the streets of London, discussing the state of the world. “Have you noticed that ever since the workweek was reduced to two days, there’s been a lot less conflict?” Samantha mused.

David nodded in agreement, “It’s true. People are just too lazy to start wars or engage in conflicts. It’s like we’ve entered a completely new era of peace.”

As the years passed, humanity began to view the Great Idle in a different light. The desire to maintain their newfound idleness led many to tap into their creative and inventive sides.

In a café in Osaka, two young inventors excitedly discussed their latest project. “We need to find a way to make money while doing as little as possible,” one of them declared.

The other inventor enthusiastically agreed, “Yes! Let’s create something that will revolutionize the world and allow us to maintain our comfortable, languid lifestyles.”

The world slowly adapted to this new way of living, as technology and innovation flourished. People found ways to maintain their comfortable, languid lifestyles while contributing to a golden age of invention. Less became more.

A TV news title declared, “The Great Idle: A Blessing in Disguise?”, and newspaper headlines proclaimed, “From Laziness to Peace: How the Epidemic of Idleness Changed the World.” Society continued to grapple with the profound implications of this new reality. As the decades passed, a profound realization dawned upon humanity: work and constant busyness had only given them a false sense of meaning and purpose. True freedom, it seemed, lay in the ability to do nothing, and it was in this state of idleness that humanity found its most profound and lasting peace. The Great Idle, initially perceived as a curse, had ultimately transformed humanity. People learned to appreciate the simple pleasures of life, and the world evolved into a harmonious, peaceful place where individuals were free to explore their thoughts and ideas without the constraints of incessant labor.

All images were generated using DALL.E 2 (Open AI)